Seen at the gym on Sunday afternoon, the two sequels to the 1999 hit
movie, The Matrix. The second movie of the trilogy is The
Matrix Reloaded and the third is The Matrix Revolutions. The
following will be a bit spoilery so if you've never seen these movies
and want to watch them sometime, skip it.
Has there ever been a trilogy in which the
later movies have fallen so far short of the level set by the first? I
didn't catch either of these in the theater and this may have been the
first time I saw the first half-hour or so of Reloaded, but great
gosh and gee whillikers are these two movies ever bad. Unhook them from
the first blockbuster and you have some stuff that straight-to-DVD
schlock-fests laugh at and take lunch money away from. Connect it to
original and you have one of the most bewildering missteps I think I've
ever seen in 40-some years of moviegoing.
The original Matrix
movie married a familiar story, some surprisingly serious
philosophy, good old-fashioned karate-choppin' action and
beyond-the-cutting edge special effects to make it a box-office smash.
The uber-cool style and unexpected braininess covered over quite a few
logical gaps -- like why the machines didn't tap geothermal power
like the human beings in Zion did, or why the machines decided to pick
human beings that had already tried to kill them as the creatures to make into batteries instead of
something a lot dumber or...you get
the point. It ends with Keanu Reeves character Neo telling the machines
that he knows their game and he's not going to play anymore. Moreover,
he's going to start telling other people what he knows and the whole
Matrix program will fall. No sequel required. Fine popcorn movie that
also tickles your thinkin' bone.
But it made a mint, so
the creators cranked up a couple of sequels without bothering to
include a story worth a darn. Except for the highly entertaining highway
chase scene in Reloaded and the quiet grace moment where Trinity
sees the sun in Revolutions, the sequels are either too talky,
too repetitive, too murky, too convoluted, too dumb, too mystical, too
goofy...again, you get the point. From the weird rave scene and
ridiculous presence of Cornel West and cloned fight scenes -- by which I
mean that the scenes repeat each other, not that Reeves fights clones,
although I guess he does -- of Reloaded to the big dumb CGI
battle and hive of new-and-unnecessary characters and Neo's powers
suddenly working outside the Matrix in Revolutions, the
second and third movies of the Matrix trilogy are a textbook case
for using time travel technology to wipe them out of existence.
In
the unofficial competition of "which moviemakers most destroyed their
own legacy," the Wachowski brothers and their less-than-pointless
sequels edge out George Lucas and his loud, dull "prequel" trilogy to Star
Wars -- if only because by the time he released the prequels people
were already beginning to suspect Lucas was a hack, and until Reloaded
spilled out into the theaters nobody dreamed the Wachowskis only
had one good movie in them.
Hello. The picture of the cat caught my attention. I have that same picture on my blog as well... with a different caption of course. Although, I'm a huge sci-fi fan, I seem to have been captivated these days by zombies and vampires... (The Walking Dead and Twilight.) Love your blog, by the way.
ReplyDeletebeneaththeelmtree.blogspot.com
I hadn't seen it in a de-motivational poster before; just found it on the web someplace when I was looking for a header background. My unofficial caption is "Ain't enough things in the world to kill to make this right, but I'm gonna start with you."
ReplyDeleteAfraid I must part company with you on Walking Dead and Twilight, but I will promise not to think ill of you for your choices ;-)