Thursday, February 12, 2015

Make Mine Scrambled

Fire up the hens, boys! Eggs won't kill you!

The Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee has taken cholesterol off the list of things that are automatically bad for you if you are an otherwise healthy person. Cholesterol, like just about anything already in our bodies or in our food, can cause you problems if you have too much of it already or if you consume too much of it, but isn't necessarily the One Ring of Dietary Substances.

The interesting thing to me is that the guideline is one of incredibly long standing -- the Washington Post story points to concerns being raised as early as 1961. But in recent years, information has shown that not only is there a kind of cholesterol that the body needs in order to function well, it actually produces cholesterol itself. Plus, regulating cholesterol amounts can create other chemical imbalances that present their own problems. The science of cholesterol effects and management, which was considered by many to be settled in some way, instead progressed as continued experiments and research uncovered new information.

Science, properly considered, isn't ever really "settled," since it involves asking questions about what is known as well as what is unknown. Which gives great hope to those of us who love Twinkies and French fries.

3 comments:

  1. Sadly, I think sugar and carbohydrates are going to become the new no-go substances.

    While I'm happy (but unsurprised - I know many people, self included, who eat copious amounts of eggs, cheese, and butter and still have normal cholesterol; it seems to be a genetic thing) I also admit a considerable fondness for cake, toast, and other carbohydrate-containing items and I don't want 20 years of being shamed out of eating THEM until the next dietary baddie is found....

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm trying to work the whole "Eat what you'd like but eat less of some things than others and don't eat so much period" thing, along with more activity. If one chicken-fried steak with gravy per month is going to kill me, I'll be just fine with that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. And if it doesn't, something else will. It's pointless to evaluate every meal on the the basis of how many hours it might shear off your lifespan.

    ReplyDelete